by German Lopez
09.04.2012
A federal judge ruled that in-person early voting in Ohio
must be extended to include the weekend and Monday before Election Day
for all voters. The ruling is a result of President Barack Obama’s
campaign team and the Democrats filing a lawsuit against Secretary of
State Jon Husted to extend early voting. Attorney General Mike DeWine
has vowed to appeal the ruling. Republicans have consistently blocked
all attempts to expand early voting in Ohio, citing costs and racial
politics.Cincinnati manufacturing is on a big rebound, according to
a new survey. The Cincinnati Purchasing Management Index, which is used
to measure manufacturing in the area, showed some decline in July, but
it is now bouncing back. The news could indicate a wider economic
recovery.Presidential candidate Mitt Romney was in town Saturday.
During his speech, Romney pointed fingers to “cheaters” like China,
which Romney believes is unfairly manipulating its currency. (China has
not been manipulating its currency for some time now.) Romney also
rolled out his plan to restore America’s economy by emphasizing small
businesses and cutting government spending. But the Brookings Institute
says the unemployment rate would be at 7.1 percent if it wasn’t for
government cuts passed by state and federal governments in the past few
years. Romney also wants to cut back on the Environmental Protection Agency, which he says is
hurting local jobs with too many regulations.
Some Democrats are calling for Husted to resign. Dennis
Lieberman and Tom Ritchie, both who were fired for attempting to expand
in-person early voting to include weekends despite Husted’s uniform
rules demanding no weekend hours, said in a press release Husted should resign for missing a
critical deadline. The deadline was to establish the ballot language and
argument against Issue 2, a ballot initiative supported by Ohio Voters
First that would place redistricting in the hands of an independent
citizens committee. If Issue 2 is not passed, politicians will continue
drawing district boundaries, which typically leads to a process known as
“gerrymandering” that politicians use to redraw districts in
politically beneficial ways. In Cincinnati, gerrymandering has been used
to de-emphasize the urban vote — or African-American vote, according to
Doug Preisse, adviser to Gov. John Kasich — by redrawing district
boundaries to include Warren County. CityBeat previously covered the redistricting issue here.Competition in the Greater Cincinnati area has allowed
some cities to pay less for trash hauling services. Rumpke previously
held a stranglehold on the business, but that seems to be changing with the arrival of legitimate competitors — such as CSI and Forest Green.
The Obama campaign will open its offices in
Cincinnati tomorrow. The Obama team promises to use the offices for a
large ground game.The Ohio Board of Regents is calling on some Ohio colleges
to continue enrolling military veterans despite a temporary disruption
in federal benefits, which was caused by a loss of records.Former Gov. Ted Strickland might run again to knock Gov.
John Kasich out of the spot. Strickland is expected to speak at the
Democratic National Convention today.Rep. John Boehner of Ohio seems to have his geography
confused. At a speech, he said he wants senatorial candidate Josh Mandel
of Ohio to win to "run Harry Reid back to Nevada.” Reid is a U.S.
senator for Nevada.U.S. home prices rose in July by the most in six years.
The news could indicate a recovery in the housing market. The housing
crash is generally attributed as the primary cause of the Great
Recession.The Democratic National Convention is heading into day two
today. The convention is touting the new Democratic platform, which now
includes support for same-sex marriage. At the Ohio delegation in the
convention, Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, who is often cited as a
potential presidential candidate for the 2016 election, criticized Kasich.A cure for baldness could be in stores as soon as five years from now.
by German Lopez
08.31.2012
Judge approves in-person early voting for weekend and Monday before Election Day
In a statement on Aug. 22, Secretary of State Jon Husted
said of early voting, “The rules are set and are not going to change.”
Husted made the comment in an attempt to end discussion over in-person
early voting hours.Unfortunately for Husted, a federal judge disagrees. In a
ruling today, Judge Peter Economus said in-person early voting must be
restored for all registered voters to include the Saturday, Sunday and
Monday before Election Day. Husted will now work with county boards of
elections around the state to decide the voting hours for those days.
The ruling is the outcome of President Barack Obama’s
campaign and the Ohio Democratic Party suing Husted to extend in-person
early voting. Before the ruling, only military personnel and their
families were allowed to vote, which the Obama team and Democrats argued
was unfair to non-military voters. With the ruling, everyone —
including military personnel and their families — will be able to vote during the three days before election day.Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine has vowed to appeal the ruling, but, for now, the news comes as a victory to Obama and Democrats in the ongoing struggle over early voting hours.
Recently, Republicans have tried to block any statewide expansion of
in-person early voting, citing costs and racial politics. Doug Preisse,
chairman of the Franklin County Republican Party and close adviser to
Gov. John Kasich, previously wrote to The Columbus Dispatch in an email,
“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process
to accommodate the urban — read African-American — voter-turnout
machine.”
Republicans defended Preisse’s racially insensitive comment by calling it
“background” and saying it was supposed to be off the record. But those
defenses didn’t match Preisse’s defense of his own comment, and they didn’t
deny the substance of the comment. CityBeat covered the racial politics behind early voting in this week’s issue (“Republicans Admit Racial Politics,” issue of Aug. 29).Mike Wilson, the Republican candidate for state
representative in Ohio’s 28th district, also voiced some concerns about
the lawsuit. He said extending in-person early
voting for everyone could make lines too long for military personnel and
their families.
0 Comments · Wednesday, August 29, 2012
“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the
voting process to accommodate the urban — read African-American —
voter-turnout machine,” said Doug Preisse, chairman of the Franklin
County Republican Party and close adviser to Gov. John Kasich.
by German Lopez
08.20.2012
Update: This blog incorrectly said Doug Preisse is the chairman of the Montgomery County Republican Party. He is the chairman of the Franklin County Republican Party.“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the
voting process to accommodate the urban — read African-American —
voter-turnout machine,” Doug Preisse, chairman of the Franklin
County Republican Party, told The Columbus Dispatch
in an email over the weekend. The admission to outright racism came at
the height of a controversy regarding weekend voting in Montgomery
County. Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted is trying to enforce uniform
in-person early voting hours with no weekend voting across the state to
avoid any discrepancies that caused a previous controversy, but county
Democrats in Dayton wanted to have weekend voting anyway. When county
Democrats refused to back down in a Board of Elections meeting, Husted,
the state official who is supposed to empower voters as much as
possible, suspended them from the Board. The move sparked
criticism from state Democrats, which eventually led to Preisse’s admission to playing racial politics.
The Ohio Board of Education is meeting today and is
expected to discuss its search for a new superintendent of public
instruction. Former Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction Stan
Heffner had to leave after an investigation found he had been misusing
state resources and encouraging legislation that benefited an employer.Taxpayers could be paying $300,000 so county officials can
avoid a tough decision. The move would preserve the property tax
rollback and let the county hold off on making a payment on the stadiums
this fiscal year. Two out of three county commissioners told the Enquirer they like the idea.Schools in the Greater Cincinnati area seem to be using
different grading scales. The disparity could put some students in a
worse spot when applying to college.Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine is suing a Cincinnati man over a Craigslist scam.The Greater Cincinnati area could soon host more film, television and video game production thanks to new tax incentives.Former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland could be making an
appearance at the Democratic national convention. The convention is a
time for parties to show off their new candidates and party platforms.Republican senatorial candidate Todd Akin of Missouri told KTVI-TV,
“First of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape]
is really rare. If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to
try to shut that whole thing down.” The extremely offensive, factually
incorrect comment was quickly picked up by media outlets, and the
senatorial candidate is now saying he “misspoke.” But misspeaking typically means
messing up one or two words. Misspeaking does not mean making a clearly
spoken argument with a very clear point.Lack of funding could be hurting national parks.Here is a spider with claws.
by German Lopez
08.20.2012
Misleading headline bogs down otherwise accurate story on important issue
In-person early voting in Hamilton County has been given a minimum price tag: $18,676. That’s how much The Cincinnati Enquirer
says it will cost to staff polling booths in downtown
Cincinnati during the early voting hours directed by Secretary of
State Jon Husted.
Unfortunately, in an effort to appear as if the early voting issue has two sides, the Enquirer
never bothered putting the number in context. The article reads as if
that number, which amounts to $406 an hour, is a big expense for
Hamilton County. In reality, the additional cost would amount to about
0.009 percent of the 2012 county budget — a rounding error in the $206 million budget. Meanwhile, the Enquirer downplayed a new $300,000 cost to county taxpayers in the top story for today's paper. The article pointed out the unnecessary cost is due to county commissioners refusing to make a tough decision, but the headline made it seem like the county is getting away with little-to-no trouble.
The number is important because costs are the top
non-racist concern Republicans bring up when opposing more early voting
hours. The other concerns are empowering military voters above normal citizens, which contradicts the entire point of civilian control of the military and ignores mail-in absentee ballots, and voter fraud, which is completely overblown by Republicans.
Over the weekend, Ohio’s early voting battle caught national headlines again when Doug Preisse, chairman of the Franklin County Republican Party, told The Columbus Dispatch
in an email, “I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the
voting process to accommodate the urban — read African-American —
voter-turnout machine.” The statement echoed earlier statements from
former Florida Republican Chairman Jim Greer, who told MSNBC that voting
restrictions are an attempt to limit voting from minorities and younger
voters.The admission to racial politics confirmed suspicions from Democrats that limiting early voting hours is at least partly about
suppressing the vote among demographics that typically vote Democrat.
The estimate comes in the middle of an ongoing controversy
regarding in-person early voting hours. Husted
said Wednesday that counties must all follow the same early voting
hours. But the hours excluded early voting during the weekend, much to
the dismay of state Democrats. In response, Democrats in Montgomery
County, which is where Dayton is, decided to try having weekend voting
anyway, and Husted suspended and threatened to fire the Democrats on the
Montgomery County Board of Elections. Democrats were not happy with the threats.“It's outrageous and borderline criminal,” said Chris Redfern, chairman of the Ohio Democratic Party, in a statement.
Ohio Democrats held a rally in Columbus this morning in
support of Montgomery County Democrats. The Dayton-area Democrats appeared in a hearing with Husted today to see if they will be fired
from the Montgomery County Board of Elections. A decision will be given later in the week.
At the hearing, Dennis Lieberman, one of the Democrats on the Montgomery County Board of Elections,
said he “was not put on the board of elections to be a puppet.”
Lieberman also pointed out that Montgomery County saved $200,000 in the
2008 elections by lowering the amount of precincts required with weekend
voting.
The controversy is following up an earlier controversy
about county-by-county discrepancies in early voting hours — an issue
Hamilton County barely avoided when Husted
directed county boards to invoke uniform in-person early voting hours
across the state a day before Hamilton County Board of Election
hearings.
by German Lopez
08.15.2012
Husted calls for longer hours in last two weeks of early voting
Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted announced today he will direct Ohio’s county boards of election to adopt standardized
early voting hours.
In-person early voting begins on Oct. 2. In a directive,
Husted said he wants the first three weeks to be kept to standard voting
hours, or 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays. An exception is made for Oct. 9,
which will have voting hours of 8 a.m. to 9 p.m., to make up for polls
being closed on Oct. 8 in observance of a state holiday.
For the final two weeks of early voting, Husted said he
wants hours extended to 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Another exception is made for
the final day of early voting — Nov. 2 — that has voting hours last from
8 a.m. to 6 p.m. because state law requires all early voting ends at 6
p.m. on Nov. 2.
The polls will still not be open on weekends throughout the entire process, however.
The news comes amid a state issue that has gained national
attention in recent weeks. Democrats have been accusing state Republicans of
suppressing Democratic votes by extending in-person early voting hours in
predominantly Republican counties and keeping shorter hours in
predominantly Democratic counties.
Ohio Democrats are not pleased with the call to
uniform rules. Jerid Kurtz, spokesperson for the Ohio Democratic Party,
told CityBeat yesterday that the call for uniform rules is “pure silliness.” He
said counties have differences, so they need different voting rules. He
called on Husted to stop worrying about uniformity and county budgets
and instead worry about managing elections and “empowering people to
vote.”
Today, Democrats released another statement lashing out at
the uniform rules. In a statement released shortly after Husted's press
conference, Chris Redfern, chairman of the Ohio Democratic Party, said
the new directive was limiting voting access by eliminating weekend
voting and slashing hours.
However, the directive will actually extend early voting
hours in the predominantly Democratic counties of Lucas, Cuyahoga,
Summit and Franklin that were bound to the old hours of 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. throughout the entire early voting process.
0 Comments · Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted
announced Aug. 9 that there is a new way for registered voters to change
their voting address: the Internet.
by Kevin Osborne
04.27.2012
Burke: Poll workers aren't 'election police'
The local Republican Party
this week sent a mass email to its members with a message from Ohio Secretary
of State Jon Husted, urging them to sign up as poll workers for this fall’s
presidential election.Alex Triantafilou, chairman
of the Hamilton County Republican Party, sent the email Tuesday.Husted noted that 40,000 poll
workers are needed across Ohio. “We can debate the efficacy of the law and
voting procedures until we are blue in the face, but the truth is that those
40,000 individuals can have more of an impact on the ultimate success of our
elections than the Secretary of State, lawmakers and judges combined,” he
wrote.When informed about the
email, the head of Hamilton County’s Democratic Party said more poll workers always
are needed. But he is worried those spurred to apply because of Husted’s email
will do so due to the wrong motivation and potentially could cause problems at
the polls.“Many of our poll workers
serve year after year in multiple elections,” said Tim Burke, Hamilton County Democratic
Party chairman. “Just because this November is a presidential election
doesn’t mean that our trained and experienced workers should be pushed aside by
those folks, on either side, who want to be poll workers in the presidential,
but not in other elections as well. That is a conversation I have had on a
number of occasions with the election protection leaders on the Democratic
side.”Burke added, “The role of
poll workers should be to assist voters in voting correctly, and better than 99
percent of the time, that is what the poll workers — be they Democrats or
Republicans — properly do. I am hesitant to bring in poll workers who think
their role is to be election police who want to spend Election Day ferreting
out fraud and subjecting qualified voters to cross examinations.”In Husted’s email, the
Secretary of State also acknowledged the partisan battle over the GOP-backed
push for voters to show a photo I.D. at polls.“Unfortunately, the fact that
there is ‘room for improvement’ seems to be the only common ground we have been
able to find when it comes to elections reform,” Husted wrote. “The closer we
get to Election Day, the more heated the rhetoric on both sides will become.
One side believes the law is too restrictive and that legal voters are being suppressed.
The other side says the system is vulnerable to fraud because there aren't
enough checks to ensure only eligible voters are casting ballots.”It should be noted that no
study has ever found evidence of widespread voter fraud.In 2007, a five-year review
conducted by the U.S. Justice Department and ordered by President George W.
Bush found that just 120 people had been charged and 86 convicted as of 2006 —
a miniscule amount when compared to the number of eligible voters in the United
States.Back then, The New York Times
wrote, “A federal panel, the Election Assistance Commission, reported last year
that the pervasiveness of fraud was debatable. That conclusion played down
findings of the consultants who said there was little evidence of it across the
country, according to a review of the original report by The New York Times
that was reported on Wednesday.”The Times added, “Mistakes
and lapses in enforcing voting and registration rules routinely occur in
elections, allowing thousands of ineligible voters to go to the polls. But the
federal cases provide little evidence of widespread, organized fraud, prosecutors
and election law experts said.”
The Republican Party also
tried to raise allegations of voter registration fraud during the 2008 presidential
election, when it began looking like John McCain would lose. When pressed in
November 2008, a top official with the McCain- Palin “Honest and Open Election
Committee” couldn’t cite a single instance in which problems with fake voter
registrations resulted in phony votes being cast.
At Husted’s urging, Republican
state lawmakers recently acted to repeal portions of House Bill No. 194. Facing
a referendum on the law in November that could’ve increased Democratic voter
turnout, the repeal restores some opportunities for early voting and allows
poll workers to guide voters to the correct precinct.In Hamilton County, Democrats
who want to be poll workers should call 513-632-7041; Republicans should call
513-632-7042.Here is Husted’s text in its
entirety:
April 24, 2012
Dear Chairman Triantafilou,
As Secretary of State, my primary responsibility is to administer a fair
election where eligible voters can freely exercise their right to vote and
have complete confidence in the accuracy of the results. This is no easy
job because the reality is that the system by which we elect our political
leaders will never be perfect.
Unfortunately, the fact
that there is "room for improvement" seems to be the only common
ground we have been able to find when it comes to elections reform. The
closer we get to Election Day, the more heated the rhetoric on both sides
will become. One side believes the law is too restrictive and that legal
voters are being suppressed. The other side says the system is vulnerable
to fraud because there aren't enough checks to ensure only eligible voters
are casting ballots. I continue to believe that we can modernize our
elections system and strike the right balance between maintaining
convenience for voters and guarding against fraud. That balance is critical
and increasingly hard to achieve when the two sides are so far apart.
I firmly believe that the
place for critics is not on the sidelines, but on the field and there is
one way we can put all this energy to a better, more productive use. I am
encouraging all who are earnest in wanting a fair, well-run 2012
Presidential Election to join me on the front lines this November by
signing up to be poll workers. Encourage like-minded friends to do
the same.It takes a team of approximately 40,000 to staff polling places around the
state, and each year all 88 county boards of elections struggle to find
enough people who are willing to take time out of their busy schedules to
serve. We can debate the efficacy of the law and voting procedures until we
are blue in the face, but the truth is that those 40,000 individuals can
have more of an impact on the ultimate success of our elections than the
Secretary of State, lawmakers and judges combined. It is Ohio's poll
workers who interact with each voter and, based on that interaction, have a
direct bearing on that voter's confidence in our system.
I am committed to working with all sides on election reforms in the future,
but for now let's put philosophical differences aside and do our part to
give each Ohio voter the best experience they can have at the polls this
November 6, 2012.
To learn more about
joining Ohio's poll-worker ranks, please visit www.PEOinOhio.com.
Sincerely, Jon Husted
by German Lopez
04.25.2012
Ohio GOP to repeal parts of its own passed legislation
This
week, Republicans are moving forward with a partial repeal of HB 194, a bill that was blasted
by voting rights groups for eliminating opportunities to vote early and disallowing pollworkers to guide voters to the correct precinct. The bill was
also criticized by Democrats for curtailing voting rights in a way that made it
harder for mostly Democratic constituents to vote.The good news first: Most of HB 194
is being repealed. It’s good to see Republicans follow the advice of Ohio
Secretary of State Jon Husted, a moderate Republican who called or the repeal
of HB 194 earlier this year.The bad news: Some new limits on
voting rights are going to remain in place, and the entire repeal process, which involves the passing of SB 295, might
be unconstitutional.While it’s good to see HB 194
repealed, it’s not the only voting law Republicans enacted last year. The Ohio
legislature also passed HB 224, which prohibited voting the Saturday, Sunday
and Monday before election day.For Democrats, this poses a bit of
a problem. Democrats are happy to see most of the restrictions on voting
repealed, but they want to see all of the restrictions repealed. If SB 295
passes, Democrats worry that the rest of the restrictions won’t be repealed
because Republicans will think they have done enough.Even the Obama team spoke on this
issue. In an email to Obama supporters Tuesday, Greg Schultz, the Ohio State
Director on the Obama team, urged voters to speak up: “This bill could mean an
end to our last three days of early voting this November — and would change the
rules, right in the middle of an election year. It's an unambiguous attack on
our voting rights.”The other problem is the repeal
could be unconstitutional. After HB 194 passed, voters were quick to speak out
against the new law and put it up for referendum in the November 2012 ballot.
So Republicans are repealing a law that is already up for referendum. This is
the first time that’s happened in the Ohio legislature, and Democrats claim it might be unconstitutional.But a lot
of that opposition may be pure political posturing. After all, Democrats were
sure they were going to win the referendum on HB 194, and they were sure they
could use it to get more supporters out to vote. With SB 295, the referendum of
HB 194 could potentially be taken off the ballot, and state Democrats will lose
one issue to hammer Republicans with in an election year.In a sense,
Democrats aren’t just upset about a “change of rules in the middle of an
election year,” as Schultz put it in his email. They’re upset about a change in
politics in the middle of an election year.Regardless,
SB 295 does have some legitimate problems. It’s good to see most of the
draconian restrictions on voting repealed, but if Republicans really want to
admit their mistake, they’ll repeal the rest of the restrictions as well.