by David Watkins
24 days ago
at 04:00 PM | Permalink
Local LGBTQ news and views
Disclaimer: Although Jenner gave
ABC, some news outlets and Jenner’s family permission to use "he," "him" and "his"
pronouns until people become comfortable with the change, I am using gender neutral
pronouns "they," "them" and "their "and dropping Jenner’s first name out of respect to
an individual that has dealt being misgendered for a large portion of their
life. Jenner also has not released their preferred name.
and white photo
showed what appeared to be a twentysomething with a shaggy bowl-cut. The person
was smiling, mouth open, revealing his probably perfect pearly whites as he
looked off camera. Who is he looking at?
Is he in mid-laugh or mid-sentence? What made the old photo interesting,
despite it being posted on Instagram by Kylie Jenner in the first place, was
how the person’s chiseled muscles and hairy abs contrasted with the tight
clothes that concealed body parts our society likes to label “vulgar” and
“inappropriate”. The last place I looked was in the eyes. I had noticed they
were looking away, but I never really looked in their eyes and tried to read
them. The eyes in the photograph read as distant, unfocused, not fully engaged.
Was I just looking at it in a different light because my prior knowledge and
context changed? The Instagram post read, “daddy throwback. #Tonight
#DianeSawyer #ABC #love”.
I had a lot
of positive and negative anxiety about the Bruce
Jenner Interview with Diane Sawyer. My two biggest passions — the queer
rights movement and popular culture — were center stage, about to sing a
dynamic duet under a hot spotlight. The iconic event would change my view on
the direction of the trans* movement, how I view the Kardashian family — a
guilty pleasure turned complete obsession, especially with Kim K. — and how the
public views a community they have little knowledge about. Waiting for the
interview to start, I was clueless as to what was in store. I only knew the
duration of the interview and sneak peeks I viewed online. While I was
confident I knew Jenner’s announcement after viewing the illegal paparazzi
shots published by the New York Daily News
of Jenner in a dress, I refused to give into the stereotypes I made based on
photographs. Jenner was the only reliable source. I did not think it was a
public relations scheme to promote a new reality show, but I wondered how it
could last two hours. What are we in
store for — two hours of ignorance and the same pictures on rotation from the
1976 Summer Olympics?
interview began and progressed, I was pleasantly surprised with Jenner’s
well-informed, genuine responses and the educational presence of the interview.
I appreciated the inclusion of newsworthy events from the past couple of years,
interviews from other transgender figures and the visual approach the interview
took in terms of explaining and comparing terminology. Here are the good and
bad moments before, during and after the interview that I found the most
interesting:Morning talk show host and
personality Wendy Williams has made controversial comments about Jenner for
years and received flack again the morning of the interview. Then on Monday,
she repeated that Jenner was “deceptive and really fame hungry like the rest of
the family.” Here is my take on this: Even if the interview was a publicity
stunt (which I do not believe it was), it almost does not matter. It educated a
record 17 million people Friday about gender and sexuality. For many viewers,
it was their first time hearing specifics about the subject. Jenner’s
documentary series — premiering on E! this summer — was not mentioned until the
last half-hour of the interview, and according to E! Online, writers will consult with GLAAD, The Kinsey Institute
and other Ph.Ds. This makes me think the docu-series will have the same
educationally driven tone the interview attained.
Diane Sawyer played the part of
uninformed mainstream America perfectly as she struggled to grasp the
difference between gender identity and sexuality, changing her wording but
essentially bringing up the same theme multiple times and asking the same
questions about gender identity versus sexuality throughout the interview. I
thought it was quite comical in the moment, but in retrospect — if Sawyer was
playing the part of “at-home-viewer” — it showed society’s inability to grasp
nonbinary ideals and accept an individual’s state of unknowing.
Jenner shades the Kardashians. Being
the Kardashian fanatic I am, I was shocked to realize 30 minutes went by without even mentioning Kim K!
Jenner proved critics wrong in a tasteful, informative program without typical
Kardashian sensationalism and not many people on social media noticed the
family’s absence — proving Jenner really did have the only real story all
along. Gasp! *cries in corner* Kim K is
still American royalty to me!
Kim K is the most accepting? Khloe
is having the hardest time?! Jenner explained that Khloe has experienced a lot
of heartache with the loss of her father, Robert Kardashian Sr., at an early
age and then alluded to her ex-husband Lamar Odom’s downward spiral toward the
end of their marriage. Jenner says Kim, on the other hand, is the easiest to
talk to about the transition. One of the lighter moments was when Jenner quoted
Kim saying, “Girl, you got to rock it, baby. You got to look good! If you’re
doing this, I’m helping you. You’re representing the family. You got to look
Jenner’s four children from his
first two marriages — Brandon and Brody, who we occasionally see on Keeping Up with the Kardashians, and
Burt and Casey (Jenner has another
daughter?! Literally, how did I not know this?) displayed unconditional love.
It’s always special when former The Hills
star Brody Jenner reappears on television, but his brother Brandon had me
swooning as he and his man bun sat by Jenner’s side in full support. But where
were Kendall and Kylie?
When a big televised event is on,
social media goes wild with Vines, Tumblr gifs and tweets making fun of
highlights from the show. When I scanned social media during commercial breaks,
I saw inconsiderate and transphobic content, of course, but positive responses
outweighed the negative drastically according to my newsfeeds.
Jenner clarified they are not a
spokesperson for the transgender community, but mentioned daily struggles the
community goes through. “The suicide rates, the murder rates, the difficulty
for especially black female women” were issues Jenner shed light on.
One of my only complaints is Jenner
answering Sawyer’s questions about their political views. We learned from the
interview that everyone deserves to live an honest, authentic life. Individuals
are entitled to support the political party of their choice. It just bothered
me that someone in a newfound position of power to be a role model, which they
are and will continue to be, would publically associate with a traditionally
anti-queer political party. Jenner lost some clout and credibility I gave them —
after an emotional, informative interview — when they said they thought
Republicans Mitch McConnell and John Boehner would be receptive to a
conversation about trans* rights… Newsweek
reached out to both individuals. No comment. Shocker.
Jenner’s mom got me choked up again
at the end. Eighty-eight-year-old Esther Jenner, who was described as “rather
conservative,” sent in a video message from her home to tell Jenner how proud
she was. “I was very proud of you when you stood on that podium in Montreal,”
she said. “I never thought that I could be more proud of you, but I’m learning
I can be.” *chills*
After an iconic, progressive and
informative two hours spent challenging gender roles and learning about gender
identity, Diane Sawyer feels the need to close on a sexist joke made by the
Soviet athlete Jenner defeated at the Olympics. He asks, “How could I have lost
to a woman?” Really?
“I’m saying goodbye to people’s
perception of me,” said Jenner. “I’m not saying goodbye to me because this has
always been me.” Enough said. Respect.
was not the only one making national headlines that day. Cincinnati received
coverage, but not for anything noteworthy. Senate, a gastropub in OTR that occasionally
picks a celebrity or current event as inspiration to name and create the Dog of
the Day, featured the “Bruce Jenner 2.0” Friday. The dish, described as “part
hot dog part taco,” had a beef frank sliced in half and filled with taco
toppings. After experiencing outrage on social media, Senate issued an apology
and donated the proceeds to The Heartland Trans Wellness Fund. This whole
situation is wrong for multiple reasons.
transgender folks received an unprecedented amount of media attention. Actress
Laverne Cox, model Carmen Carrera and author Janet Mock reestablished how
reporters and talk show hosts speak to trans* individuals by speaking out when
they felt uncomfortable or triggered in interviews and making it an on-air
educational opportunity. One of the main themes in these interviews was America’s
fascination with transgender genitalia instead creating conversation about the
trans* suicide rate or homeless queer youth. The bottom line was that trans* public
figures wanted to be valued for more than what is in their pants. Sexual
reassignment surgery is typically the final stage of the transformation, but
not required or done by everyone. It is a monumental and hyper-personal moment
for individuals that continue on in that journey. The “Bruce Jenner 2.0” was a
symbol of how privileged individuals and businesses appropriate minority groups,
even for just one day of media buzz, and increased revenue. Senate’s actions
were regressive to the strides Cox and others made in regards to how we speak
to trans* people.
interview was unprecedented and a major success for trans* visibility, but it
does not change the suicide rate or the fact that seven trans* women of color
were murdered the first eight weeks of 2015. Visibility in the media and
educating the masses is crucial to the movement, but it must translate to
policies and how mainstream society treats transgender people. Jenner is not
the first to show public displays of bravery. As the trans* rights movement
continues on and we meet new faces, let us not forget the historical events
like the Stonewall riots and the unspoken queer heroes that paved the way for
Jenner to come out and educate the nation on primetime television.
you always hear that eyes are windows to the soul. If that is true, why is it
the last place we truly look? Why is it so romantic and out of the ordinary
when you are on a date and the other person describes your eyes in great detail,
as opposed to generalizations like, “You’re beautiful,” and “You look so hot in
that”? During Jenner interview, I saw it all in their eyes — the pain, the
relief, “her”. I saw it again as they replayed scenes from Keeping Up with the Kardashians. When now-ex-wife Kris made fun of
Jenner’s clothing and style, what I perceived as annoyance when I watched the
episode years ago I now perceived as hurt and pain in Jenner’s eyes. In the flashback
scene of Khloe referring to Jenner as a strong male presence in her life,
Jenner looks deep in thought and distant.
changes a viewer’s perception, and we need to start paying attention.
Reflecting back on Kylie’s Instagram photo of a young Jenner, I realized that I
had to get past the short jean shorts and cut-off tee to truly see the
photograph. You never really know someone’s life or the journeys they are on. Here
was the model “masculine figure,” but inside Jenner was filled with emotions
and feelings most people cannot begin to understand. Like society’s fascination
with what transgender folks have below the waist, we could not see that Jenner
had a lot more depth to him that we presumed. Jenner’s closing advice for
people was to “have an open mind and have an open heart.” This ideology can be
translated to different aspects of our life and the relationships with others,
especially those we do not know. Together we are all connected, making up
collective humanity. We are one.
full interview with Jenner and Diane Sawyer here.
by David Watkins
101 days ago
at 04:44 PM | Permalink
Local LGBTQ news and views
Louisville and Columbus receive more national recognition for a growing queer
community, especially when it comes to nightlife, it made me think: Where is
Cincinnati’s place in all of this? What burgeoning queer organizations or
popular queer spots in town are making their mark and promoting education,
change and the values that make up the queer movement?
First on my
list is Queen City Queer Theatre Collective. Conceived by actor and director
combo Linnea Bond and Lindsey Augusta Mercer, this uprising theater company
presents play readings that speak to the queer experience. The goal: Create
conversation, challenge social norms and ideals, and enjoy moving plays in a
relaxed environment. With assistance from Below Zero owner Nigel Cotterill and
sponsor Absolut Vodka, the group of artists performs readings once a month for
free at Below Zero’s Cabaret Lounge. I caught up with Bond to learn more about
QCQTC and why it is important to Cincinnati.
CityBeat: What inspired you to start
Linnea Bond: I wanted to, first, work more. I’m
an actor, and I wanted to do more work. And I wanted to do more work that
mattered to me. I saw a hole in Cincinnati. Cincinnati kind of fell behind, but
there’s also a lot of people who are interested in talking about their
experience and there’s a lot of people experiencing life as a queer person who
don’t have that kind of outlet to talk about it and are not seeing their
stories onstage. And as a queer person myself, it was a part of my life that I
didn’t get to experience that much before. I grew up Evangelical and pretty
much as an adult came to terms with the fact that I was allowed to explore that
part of myself. So it was something I’d been thinking about — how to explore
parts of art that I wanted to address, and also be working more. So I decided
to start this group and I found a space — I talked to Nigel. A friend of mine
from high school helped me make that connection, and I knew that her finance
was a director. I’d seen some of her work and I sought her out and talked to
her about maybe being a consistent director and working on this project. And
she was really excited about it, so she came on and we moved forward together
as co-founders and got other people involved. I got together a cast for the
first show — of people who were really excited to do this — and we moved
forward from there. It’s just really evolved. The community has really come out
to support us, and it’s been a really exciting and rewarding process.
CB: What was is it like working with
Below Zero Cabaret Lounge owner Nigel Cotterill?
LB: Nigel actually was so excited about
the first reading. He really wanted to support us and I was putting forth money
on my own for the rights of the first show. He volunteered to take care of
those for us, which was fantastic. And he offered to broker that relationship
with Absolut Vodka, so now they sponsor us for rights for every show. That is
something we are also so grateful for. And we’re grateful for [Nigel] to be extending
that space to us, and it’s been a really positive relationship for the bar, I
think, so it’s just wonderful overall. His bar is a huge cornerstone for queer
culture in Cincinnati. It’s a place where not only queer people feel
comfortable, but I know a lot of not queer people who go there and love the
culture and experience. I think it is a really wonderful, inviting,
nonjudgmental, celebratory place. I think that it’s really cool that we get to
partner with him in that space.
CB: What is your view on the queer
movement in Cincinnati? Why are organizations like yours important to the city
and queer community?
LB: From my perspective as an artist, I
think that art and artists are the soul of a society. I think that if we aren’t
doing things, society will often close up and become cold towards whatever we
are not talking about. Especially in Cincinnati, where there is a thriving
queer culture, that there still is not legalized gay marriage. There are
certain parts of town I’ve worked in before where I’ve received
closed-mindedness toward queer rights and the queer experience. I think there
are a lot of forward-minded people and there’s a lot of backward-minded people.
So we are really hoping to encourage that discussion and make it a normal thing
for us to be talking about. My hope in the future is that — as we’ve seen lots
of supporters come out [to support], lots of activists, lots of people who
share our experience — I hope that it extends to people who might not be
comfortable with that conversation. I hope they feel welcome to come experience
our art, and gain something they have not experienced before. That is why
[QCQTC] thinks [performances] should be free. We want to be accessible to
everyone, no matter what their financial background is.
CB: What can an audience member
expect when attending a reading?
LB: We were wondering how it was going
to be perceived because people are used to a full presentation. We knew people
would like it, but we were surprised at how much people like having that
different format. We do it very efficiently, very quickly. We put that show up;
so we only have a couple of rehearsals. It is also up to our director, Lindsey,
on how it is going to be staged. There is sometimes movement on and off stage.
Sometimes there’s a little movement and staging in it. But ultimately, we want
to focus on the text and communicating that text and those relationships as
well as we can.
CB: Your website explains that QCTQC brings “free public
theatre to Cincinnati’s queer bar scene, giving locals the chance to celebrate
the queer experience in art while enjoying drinks and downtown nightlife.” But
what are your goals for the future? Do you ever plan on expanding to an actual
theater space or a larger venue?
LB: Anything is possible at this point.
We love our relationship with Nigel, so we appreciate the space and want to
maintain that. But we have thought about possible partnerships with churches.
GLSEN is an organization we also respect. We want places that are available to
youth. We are very limited by the fact that people who are under 21 cannot come
to our performances because it is a bar. We are hopeful for increasing
accessibility in the future. We don’t know what that is going to look like, but
that is something we think about. How can we expand? How can we reach more
CB: What is your process when
choosing from a plethora of queer plays and literature?
LB: Some of it has to do with logistical
constraints — you know how big the cast is, that stuff. We really want to do
trans* shows, but we’re really sensitive to the fact that we don’t want to put
a cis[gender] actor in the position of playing a trans* character. That is
something we have to think about in terms of casting in the best way we can. We
hope for that in the future, but it is wherever our heart leads. We have plenty
of time. We’re in a sustainable position, so if something moves us — that we
can’t do right now — we can perform it later. The first play that we did — The Beebo Brinker Chronicles is one I
found over the summer — moved me so much because it shows so many different
perspectives, especially the queer experience from the woman’s perspective.
Additionally — and some people might disagree with me on this — I think that it
is an early example of someone who wants to change their gender in a society
that doesn’t have that dialogue.
CB: The past decade has provided
entertainment through television programing like The L Word and Orange is the New Black that gives the queer woman’s perspective as
you mentioned. Now TV shows like Transparent and RuPaul’s Drag Race have entered
the mainstream, sparking a conversation about gender identity and gender roles
in society. This has not always been the case. Still, today, the entertainment industry
continues to glamorize the cisgender white male experience. Do these pop
cultural themes or the role of cisgender white males in society contribute to
the plays you choose to perform?
think of ourselves foremost as educators, but we think of ourselves, also, as
artists telling good stories that are moving. I, personally, would like to do
more shows that are about the intersectionality between the oppressive queer
experience and other experiences of oppression.
CB: In high school I read Angels
in America by Tony Kushner and it changed
the way I see the world, myself as a queer individual and the queer movement.
What was the first queer play you read that inspired you to connect your art
LB: That’s a great question! There was
certainly stuff before this, but my mind first goes to reading The Beebo Brinker Chronicles last
summer. I was able to come across a play that had characters I could really
connect to — people who didn’t think they were allowed to feel the attraction
that they felt.
can one get involved or audition for QCTQC? Is it only 21 and older?
LB: We’re working on it. We don’t have
answers yet, but we know there is that energy and we’re really trying to find
ways to serve it. The best way is to get in contact with us through our email,
which is firstname.lastname@example.org. We
started this through a grassroots energy effort and if people have that
excitement to join, we absolutely want to meet that energy. We feel so grateful
to the people who have supported us, who have been moved by what we are doing.
I feel so grateful.
Queen City Queer Theatre Collective
presents a reading of The Night Larry
Kramer Kissed Me by David Drake tonight at 7:30 p.m. at Below Zero Cabaret
Lounge. 1122 Walnut St.,
Local LGBTQ advocates discuss Cincinnati's dramatic progress, and how we can become even more inclusive
0 Comments · Wednesday, May 28, 2014
Cincinnati not so long ago felt mired in the negative
perception still lingering after Mapplethorpe, Article XII and the 2001
race riots. The good news is that things appear to be changing.
0 Comments · Wednesday, June 26, 2013
To get a glimpse inside the
lives of the people of Pride in the Queen City, we’ve collected personal interviews with prominent
members of city’s LGBTQ community to discuss what it’s like to be gay in
Cincinnati today and what they’re doing to make this city a more open
Publicly challenging the issue of custodial rights for homosexual couples
0 Comments · Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Michele Hobbs and Amanda Broughton have
been together for almost five years, married for two, and during this
time they’ve accomplished everything they set out to do as a couple.
Creating a community for trans* and queer people to connect and express themselves
1 Comment · Wednesday, June 26, 2013
JAC Stringer’s path to becoming your
average fuchsia-haired twentysomething living, working and playing in
Cincinnati has probably been a little bit different than yours. And
Breaking down gender and body image walls by publicly discussing her experience as a gay, body-positive woman living in Cincinnati
0 Comments · Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Cortnie Owens has come pretty far from her
rural East Side upbringing. After choosing to remain closeted about her
sexuality during her high school years, Owens escaped the countryside
to pursue a lifestyle decidedly more urban.
Connecting LGBTQ and allied businesses with the broader community through a visible local reference publication
0 Comments · Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Rich Sherman is one of the founders of CNKY Scene (cnkyscene.com),
a monthly magazine highlighting LGBTQ entertainment, nightlife,
businesses and the allied community in Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky.
Forwarding acceptance and inclusion through legislative action
0 Comments · Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Like many lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals, City
Councilman Chris Seelbach and his partner Craig Schultz have a skeptical
sense of optimism about the city’s changing attitudes.
0 Comments · Wednesday, September 26, 2012
This year’s seventh annual Downtown Dayton LGBT Film Festival lineup definitely addresses a new honest reality, this striving for a sense of urgent
authenticity, both through the films and the celebratory events.