WHAT SHOULD I BE DOING INSTEAD OF THIS?
 
May 27th, 2010 By | News | Posted In: Republicans, Tea Party, 2010 Election

Finney Strikes Out

3 Comments
     
Tags:
For all the chatter about conservatives and Tea Partiers trying to take over the Republican Party by becoming precinct executives, the person who is perhaps the most prominent local conservative lost his race.

Amid the pages and pages of results from the May 4 primary election is the news that attorney Chris Finney, a leader of the Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST), was defeated in his bid for a seat on the Hamilton County Republican Party’s Central Committee.

Finney, an Anderson Township resident, ran for the “Anderson F” district, against fellow attorney James S. Ginocchio. Alas, Finney’s neighbors and fellow Republicans preferred Ginocchio, a former assistant city solicitor.

In a squeaker, Ginocchio got 51.04 percent of ballots cast (98 votes) to Finney’s 48.96 percent (94 votes).

Although the tally is close, if Finney can’t win in a year with Tea Party fever sweeping the land, it doesn’t bode well for his future efforts.

The party’s Central Committee  is comprised of one person from each precinct in the county. Every two years, the Central Committee elects the party’s Executive Committee, which votes on a party’s policy positions.

 
 
05.28.2010 at 04:43 Reply
It is obvious the writer is not objective. What does he mean the guy struck out? At least he ran. And a race decided by four votes? Is that worth the space and time. Such animosity!

 

05.28.2010 at 09:40 Reply
HA-HA! More fail for TOAST. Fat Finney the Fink got his & TOAST's asses kicked at the polls last November and again this time. Schadenfreude!

 

05.28.2010 at 09:45 Reply
"Dieter", whose real name is Paul Wallpe, hates the government, namely because the City forced him to clean up the trash infested slum that he owns. See the public records at the Clerk of Court's website, or simply google cincinnati vs Paul Wallpe or look here: http://www.hamilton-co.org/appealscourt/docs/decisions/C-070115_03052008.pdf

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close