WHAT SHOULD I BE DOING INSTEAD OF THIS?
 
Home · Articles · News · Porkopolis · Fear and Loathing on the Far Right

Fear and Loathing on the Far Right

By Kevin Osborne · March 17th, 2010 · Porkopolis
Molly Ivins, the late syndicated columnist from Texas, got it right when she wrote, “Being slightly paranoid is like being slightly pregnant — it tends to get worse.”

For the truth of that statement, look no further than the agenda for an April 17 event planned by the Springboro Tea Party just north of Cincinnati.

The event, called “Bringin’ Back Conservatism: Doin’ It Again in 2010,” is one of several planned by Tea Party groups across the nation that are timed to coincide with the federal tax filing deadline.

I’ve written before that most Teabaggers have little in the way of a coherent political philosophy other than their shared hatred of Big Government, which they simplistically and erroneously view as the source of all problems. (I’d argue that problems stemming from a bloated government are less harmful than those caused by a reckless, unfettered free market, although that’s really a false dichotomy anyhow.)

To kick off the Springboro event, Teabaggers will watch a movie on DVD. The actual film is being selected by an online poll now underway, but the choices have such titles as Shadow Government, Camp FEMA, Fall of the Republic and — in a nod to anti-Obama “birthers” everywhere — A Question of Eligibility. Be sure to bring popcorn.

The choices feature a veritable cornucopia of current far right thinking, displaying the distorted fears and anxieties of people who feel they’re disenfranchised from their government.

Fall of the Republic, for example, alleges an offshore corporate cartel is bankrupting the U.S. economy by design. It’s part of a plot to establish a world government in which the dollar will be replaced with a new global currency.

Camp FEMA alleges the government has created secret concentration camps across the nation to detain U.S. citizens if they get too unruly. (In fact, some camps do exist but aren’t exactly a secret; they’ve been used to hold undocumented immigrants, who are a frequent punching bag for the Tea Party crowd.)

I could go on, but you can see the general theme emerging. All of this reminds me of another group that flourished during paranoid times, the John Birch Society in the 1950s. Birchers believed secret Communists had infiltrated U.S. society and opposed such efforts as fluoridating public water supplies, calling it a Communist plot to harm Americans’ health, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging it infringed on states’ rights.

“Get U.S. out of the U.N.” was their fevered cry.

Oh, wait: Look who’s also attending the Tea Party next month.

That’s right, multiple speakers from the John Birch Society. These days, the society’s targets include the Federal Reserve Bank.

Others scheduled at the Springboro event include ex- Congressman James Traficant, who spent seven years in prison on corruption charges; Rebecca Heimlich, wife of ex-County Commissioner Phil Heimlich, who’s shilling for the corporate-backed Americans for Prosperity; and State Sen. Shannon Jones (R-Springboro).

Meanwhile, Republican officials are actually encouraging this sort of thinking in a cynical ploy to regain control of Congress and the presidency.

U.S. Rep. John Boehner, the House Minority leader who hails from West Chester, recently called Tea Party followers “great patriots.” Boehner said, “It’s not enough, however, for Republicans to simply voice respect for what the Tea Partiers are doing, praise their efforts and participate in their rallies. Republicans must listen to them, stand with them and walk among them.”

As Hamilton County Republican Party Chairman Alex Triantafilou posted on his blog, “We continue to embrace those energized by the Tea Party. Our challenge is to field candidates who can earn their support. We’ll keep trying locally.”

And let’s not forget all the candidates — including county commission contenders Chris Monzel and Leslie Ghiz — who recently signed a Tea Party pledge. (Some Democrats also aren’t immune from this nonsense. County Auditor Dusty Rhodes writes a regular column on a local Tea Party blog.)

The thing is, Tea Partiers aren’t wrong: They are disenfranchised, to a degree.

Income disparity between the middle class and the wealthy in the United States is at an all-time high, even higher than during the Great Depression, and has almost doubled since 2000.

The affluent are paying far less in taxes than at any other time in modern history. Timid politicians have let corporations run amok, flooding our nation with dangerous, barely scrutinized prescription drugs and unsafe toys, just to name two examples.

This has all happened, in large measure, because politicians have exploited fear and anger to convince many citizens to vote against their own economic self-interest.

Unfortunately, Greater Cincinnati and Southwest Ohio have always seemed especially vulnerable to bad ideas born of fear and paranoia. A prime example of this is the city charter amendment prohibiting the fluoridation of Cincinnati’s water system unless voters first approve it.

The embarrassing kicker? It was added in 1974, a decade or more after most rational people gave up that fight. Only when the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency intervened did fluoride finally get added.

I hope it doesn’t take that long for people to get wise about the Tea Party’s rhetoric.

*****

It’s high time for Boehner, U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell, Senate wannabe Rob Portman and Congressional Republicans to call for the end of Social Security and Medicare. Seriously.

If that crowd is so dead set against “government-run health care” of any sort, then why haven’t they acted to get rid of those politically popular programs?

Every conservative senior citizen and Teabagger currently railing against possible cuts in their Medicare benefits under a reapportioned health care system should remember that the Republican Party — at the insistence of corporate interests — opposed the program’s creation in the 1960s.

As part of the GOP’s strategy, leaders got some amiable actor named Ronald Reagan to record an album that could be played at neighborhood parties for women, organized by the wives of physicians.

On the album, Reagan said, “But at the moment I’d like to talk about another way because this threat is with us and at the moment is more imminent. One of the traditional methods of imposing statism (sic) or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project.”

Reagan later continued, “Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We have an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.”

Actually, it was a GOP-controlled Congress who rejected it, some 60 years ago. My instincts tell me the outcome might be different if left up to modern-day Americans.


PORKOPOLIS TIP LINES: 513-665-4700 (EXT.147) or pork@citybeat.com


 
 
 
 

 

 
03.17.2010 at 08:55 Reply
Can you provide a citation for this statement: "The affluent are paying far less in taxes than at any other time in modern history." I believe it's true, but I've seen some CBO figures massaged to say otherwise. I'd like to see the numbers for myself to know who's distorting what.

 

03.17.2010 at 09:26 Reply
Under President Obama, the tax rate on the wealthy is 39.6 percent. Under Bush II, it was 35 percent. President Reagan imposed a 50 percent tax rate during his first term, President Nixon had a 70 percent rate and President Eisenhower had a 91 percent rate.

 

03.18.2010 at 04:13 Reply
Lets not forget the criminal past of Chris Monzel with 2 serious charges.

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close